<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking differently about Google Gears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 15:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-69004</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/index.php/archives/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/#comment-69004</guid>
		<description>Erwyn,

Yeah. A database like file system has been a pipe dream for many, many years. But this would be a little different. Much smaller scale and scope. None of the pie-in-the-sky promises that WinFS was about.

Aaron,

Yeah, synchronization is hard with only two machines. Let alone &#039;n&#039; number of machines. It does require that you do all of your data access client side using XmlHttp requests. Using this with any current server-side technologies would be tough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erwyn,</p>
<p>Yeah. A database like file system has been a pipe dream for many, many years. But this would be a little different. Much smaller scale and scope. None of the pie-in-the-sky promises that WinFS was about.</p>
<p>Aaron,</p>
<p>Yeah, synchronization is hard with only two machines. Let alone &#8216;n&#8217; number of machines. It does require that you do all of your data access client side using XmlHttp requests. Using this with any current server-side technologies would be tough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erwyn van der Meer</title>
		<link>http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-68950</link>
		<dc:creator>Erwyn van der Meer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/index.php/archives/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/#comment-68950</guid>
		<description>A common data store for all applications gives me too much of a WinFS déjà vu. Microsoft has tried to go down that road and failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common data store for all applications gives me too much of a WinFS déjà vu. Microsoft has tried to go down that road and failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-68940</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 03:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/index.php/archives/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/#comment-68940</guid>
		<description>I think you may have a common data store for your online and offline apps.  It beats rolling your own active x control to accomplish synchronization.  Not sure how much else, how would my offline site run unless its all client side JavaScript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may have a common data store for your online and offline apps.  It beats rolling your own active x control to accomplish synchronization.  Not sure how much else, how would my offline site run unless its all client side JavaScript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Gears &#171; Shebanation</title>
		<link>http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/comment-page-1/#comment-68908</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Gears &#171; Shebanation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lazycoder.com/weblog/index.php/archives/2007/05/31/thinking-differently-about-google-gears/#comment-68908</guid>
		<description>[...] 5-31-07] When I talked about the new possibilities, this is exactly the kind of thing I was talking about&#8230;    This entry was written by ashebanow and posted on 30May07 at 17:24 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5-31-07] When I talked about the new possibilities, this is exactly the kind of thing I was talking about&#8230;    This entry was written by ashebanow and posted on 30May07 at 17:24 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

