Lazycoder

28Mar/083

Do links really matter?

I’ve been thinking about this for quite some time. Occasionally I’ll see other people write about a topic either soon after I do or after I’ve had some kind of conversation with them about the topic. Sometimes they don’t link to my post or mention our conversation in their posts. Often the blogger in question has a lot more subscribers than me or in some way, more visibility. In the age of “page views” ,Techmeme, reddit, Digg, and “influencers” traffic, and subscribers, are king. Often when a high visibility person posts about a topic I’ve covered, they add more to the conversation or find an angle that I missed. Which increases the value of the topic or idea. I think some of these postings can be chalked up to coincidence. The odds of technology writers reading the same weblogs, social news sites, tech news sites, and being inspired to write about a topic they’ve both read are pretty good.

So if the point of your writing is to spread ideas or opinions that you’ve had, does a link really matter? Should you care if you get credit? I’m not talking about plagiarism. I mean something more along the lines of inspiration. I don’t think they do. As long as the message gets out, you should be happy.

The point here isn’t to whine about not getting my due. Because I don’t really care about traffic or subscribers. I started a weblog to practice writing and communicating ideas. And, as someone reminded me last night, it ain’t writing if it’s marked “draft”. I do use Feedburner, but mainly because it’s almost seamless to use in WordPress and it is interesting to see how many people are subscribed to me. I’m hooked up to Google Analytics because I like to see who is linking to specific posts and participating in a conversation with me. Trackbacks aren’t reliable.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • DotNetKicks
  • DZone
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • HackerNews
  • Netvibes
  • Posterous
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
Filed under: General Leave a comment
Comments (3) Trackbacks (1)
  1. Now that you have me thinking, I feel a blog post coming on.

  2. what, specifically, are you referring to?

  3. @Jeff
    Well one that kind of got the ball rolling on this post for me was a conversation I had on Twitter with Raymond Lewallen about whether you should be passionate about software development or problem solving. He wrote a post here.
    http://codebetter.com/blogs/raymond.lewallen/archive/2007/12/27/are-you-a-problem-solver-or-a-developer.aspx
    At first, my ego said “He should have linked to your tweets.”, but then I realized that my tweets wouldn’t have enhanced hist post in any way and that my ego was petty and wrong.

    Raymond posted about one of the ideas I like to espouse, the idea that the problem should take the front seat to the technology. It doesn’t matter that much if your algorithm runs really fast or if you’re using DI to make your code more flexible if the code you’re writing doesn’t make the users job/life easier in some way. At least in terms of business programming. It’s not an original idea and I can’t claim ownership. Raymond said what I think much better than I did. To try to claim that his post required a link to my tweets showing inspiration would be wrong.


Leave a comment