Comments on: JavaScript: Not for the faint at heart?

By: michigan insurance company

michigan insurance company — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 05:06:08 +0000

You are right jQuery and PrototypeJS are excellent libraries. Aside from that, it’s all up in the air.

By: Dew Drop – August 14, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Dew Drop – August 14, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:09:14 +0000

[...] JavaScript: Not for the faint at heart? (Scott Koon) [...]

By: Daily Links for Friday, August 14th, 2009

Daily Links for Friday, August 14th, 2009 — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:32:01 +0000

[...] JavaScript: Not for the faint at heart? | Lazycoder [...]

By: temp304.acc@gmail.co

temp304.acc@gmail.co — Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:55:32 +0000

very cool & good tip, thank you very much for sharing.

By: JavaScript: Not for the faint at heart? | Lazycoder

JavaScript: Not for the faint at heart? | Lazycoder — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:08:36 +0000

[...] more: JavaScript: Not for the faint at heart? | Lazycoder SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "JavaScript: Not for the faint at heart? | Lazycoder", url: [...]

By: Ryan Roberts

Ryan Roberts — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:46:32 +0000

Nice to see this, Script# looks like very much the wrong approach other than for its ability to integrate with server controls in webform development. I really don’t have experience of developing javascript at scale to justify my hunch.